Login

Remember

Register

Questions
Unanswered
Tags
Users
Ask a Question

X issued a cheque of RS. 2,000 written on XYZ bank. The cheque was inadvertently returned by the bank unpaid. X is entitled to claim

0 votes

asked Aug 24 in Legal Studies by admin (72.3k points)

X issued a cheque of RS. 2,000 written on XYZ bank. The cheque was inadvertently returned by the bank unpaid. X is entitled to claim

A

Nominal damages

B

Special damages

C

Vindictive damages

D

Liquidated damages

Approved answer

Correct option is C)

Facebook Google+ Twitter LinkedIn Reddit Email

Your answer

Your name to display (optional):

Email me at this address if my answer is selected or commented on:Email me if my answer is selected or commented on

Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.

1 Answer

0 votes

answered Aug 24 by admin (72.3k points)

Best answer

X issued a cheque of RS. 2,000 written on XYZ bank. The cheque was inadvertently returned by the bank unpaid. X is entitled to claim

A

Nominal damages

B

Special damages

C

Vindictive damages

D

Liquidated damages

Approved answer

Correct option is C)

Your comment on this answer:

Your name to display (optional):

Email me at this address if a comment is added after mine:Email me if a comment is added after mine

Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.

Related questions

0 votes

1 answer

Principle: When there is breach of contract, the resulting damages will have to be paid by the party breaching the contract to the aggrieved party. However, the parties are free to agree as to damages payable in advance in case there is breach of contract.Facts: Mr. Ramesh entered into a contract with Mr. Ramakrishna for selling his green Alto Car for Rs. 3 lakhs. Mr. Ramakrishna was to pay Rs. 3 lakhs on or before 25^th April 2005 and take possession of the car. The party failing to honour the contract has to pay Rs. 40,000/ - as damages to the other party. Mr. Ramakrishna has not performed his apart of the contract. Mr. Ramesh is claiming Rs. 40,000/ - .

asked Aug 24 in Legal Studies by admin (72.3k points)

0 votes

1 answer

Choose the correct answer from the alternatives given.D P Tyre Co. Ltd sold tyres to a dealer S, who sold those to D, a sub - dealer on the condition that those tyres would not be sold at a price lower than the list price fixed by D P Tyre Co. Ltd. and if the tyre were sold at a price lower than the list price, a penalty of 2 for every tyre sold below the list price would be recovered as damages. D sold five tyres below the list price. D P Tyre Co. Ltd filed a suit against S. Is D P Tyre Co. Ltd entitled to maintain the suit?

asked Aug 24 in Legal Studies by admin (72.3k points)

0 votes

1 answer

Upset at the series of protests being planned and conducted at the MNUSU campus, the district magistrate passes an order under Section 144 of the CrPC on 19 July 2019, prohibiting any group of three or more people from gathering anywhere on the MNUSU campus after 5 p.m. and before 10 a.m. On 27 December, 2019, a group of five MNUSU students went to the college canteen together to have dinner at 10:30 p.m. Seeing this, the police constable stationed on duty at the campus stopped them, and told them he was taking them to the police station since they had violated the order issued by the District Magistrate. The students challenge this act of the police constable. Will they succeed?

asked Aug 20 in Legal Studies by admin (72.3k points)

0 votes

1 answer

Principle : A citizen is expected to take reasonable duty of care while driving on the road and not to cause injuries to any person.Facts : X, the owner of a car, asked his friend Y to drive the car to his office. As the car was near his (X's) office, it hit a pedestrian P on account 'Y's negligent driving and injured him seriously. P sued X for damages. Which one of the following is correct?

asked Aug 24 in Legal Studies by admin (72.3k points)

0 votes

1 answer

A historical monument situated in India is maintained by the Government. The monument is also a Hindu place of worship and is visited by several thousand Hindu worshippers every day, who pray at the monument. The Government passes a rule making it compulsory for all visitors who are not Indian citizens to pay a fee of Rs. 500/ - for each visit to the monument. A foreign citizen who is also a Hindu and regularly visits the monument, challenges this rule on the grounds that it is violative of their right under Article 15. Will this challenge succeed?

asked Aug 24 in Legal Studies by admin (72.3k points)

Categories

All categories
Poilitical Science (25)
EVS (10)
Legal Studies (676)
wiki (24)
business Studies (99)

Send feedback

Powered by Approved answer

...